power was (and is) always power over others, which is more or less always exploitation and injustice, and it almost exclusively the weak and the powerless against.
in human history as an unbroken history of power can be extended to all periods, the irrepressible desire of people to determine, on other to rule and they depress, they exterminate defame and degrade, to enslave them and kill them.
In this highly dualistic of forces between power and powerlessness , between domination and cruel Abha ; ngigkeitsverhältnissen there were always losers, people who had to pull the shorter - and among them were always, and especially women
"They cut me with a razor blade, a piece of meat between his legs. out - afterwards they sewed me literally with a sheep intestine. Conservative estimates by the World Health Organization, speaking of 80 million - other no less credible statistics of 130 million! -. Women and girls who have experience only in North and Central Africa, the terrible experience of female circumcision
In Egypt, betrayed courageous sociologists, 70% of urban women and 90% of rural women circumcised. More than 100,000 girls die each year from this painful ordeal. The fundamental devaluation of women and the female can hardly get a stronger expression than just in the mutilation the female genitals - it is the destruction of the woman as a woman in her sexuality and belonging to its essence, a brutal cut in their soul, from this injury is never whole again.
genital mutilation is an act of oppression, neglect and abuse, which women are exposed because they are women. ! Face of such disgusting patriarchal patterns of thinking must be propagated globally: Human rights are not rights of men
In 1793, in Poznan, the last witch burned - because of witch hunt in the supposedly "dark" Middle Ages! The Memory of genocide of Jews, Armenians and Kurds in the media always boiled new - but is forced to forget the inhuman spectacle of the witch craze, the indescribable injustice murder of millions of innocent women as witches allegedly allied with Satan himself.
The demonization of women has a long history, and already, the male authors of the report creation has struck for the beginning of human history in passing blame cheap attempt to Eva Adams the chord for the inferiority of women "The woman you put here with me, she gave me the Tree, where to eat and I ate "
This Adam and Eve myth -. The wife came in second in the world and has sinned be the first! - Is the basis for male and female shift blame original sin. The woman (Eve) as a seductress and as an accomplice of Satan, the equation of Eve with the evil, this has already let Tertullian (2nd century) say: "You are the goal of Satan ... you deserve to die, and instead had to die, the son of God. "
500 years, were burned" witches ", innocent Girls and women, especially midwives and wise women, referring to the primal power of Eros, the woman, ultimately, the primal power of their own sex drive, which the man (and celibate clergy) did not admit was allowed to. For torture and burning men were always the informer, prosecutor and judge, the sadistic torturer and executioner. Estimates amount to up to nine million victims of the madness of the witch trials!
Throughout human history have been (and until the present day) is not only a vicious dualism between man and nature, but also between women and men, as it piled up as totally irreconcilable polarity: evil - well, underprivileged - higher quality, and this in total disregard of the incontrovertible truth that the archetype of the woman and of God or the Divine Feminine is much more related than the principle of masculinity.
because the origin of life itself, his death and his rebirth in the course of nature tells of a mystery, the the woman - in myth and history - much closer than is the man! Not only for the Greek Philosopher Aristotle was the wife of an unfinished, of failed and broken "man", that at a deeper level of head of development derailed and stopped in their development process and misdirected, and for the great theologian Thomas Aquinas was the wife misguided and mutilated male, something that is not intended in itself but is due to a defect. Bernard of Clairvaux called the woman a primitive, low-quality sexual being, an imperfect animal (!).
The Christian "misogyny" has ultimately biblical Background. Already in the creation story, Genesis 3 verse 16, a chord is struck, in the West clearly echoed in the oppression of women or in the supremacy of the man: "And the woman said the Lord: all I want your hardship, Thou shalt bring forth children in appeal. After your husband is thy desire, and he shall be your master, "
The God of the Old Testament speaks of love as a curse: the patriarchy is the first sentence - the love is in a Machtgefä! ; ll change. To the fact that the Genesis the woman to the subordinates of the man has done is das Fatale dies: Es hat sich nicht nur die gesamte abendländische Kultur daran orientiert, sondern diese Aussage hat den Machtanspruch des Mannes, die Zweitrangigkeit und die Nachordnung der Frau hinter dem Manne quasi aus göttlicher Ordnung und Allmacht legitimiert und als natürliche Schöpfungsordnung festgeschrieben.
Man hat die Bibel immer selektiv gelesen und interpretiert, wobei die Theologen so gut wie ausschließlich Männer waren. So hat denn Genesis 1,27 keine Wirkungsgeschichte gehabt: „Und Gott schuf den Menschen nach seinem Bilde, nach dem Bilde Gottes schuf er ihn, als Mann und Frau schuf er sie.“ This is clearly expressed that the woman participates equally in the image of God as the man - in unmistakable clarity formulated the text of the equivalence, the equal dignity and equal status of women
! But this passage more or less fizzled out in the heritage of the Judeo-Christian father religion, where God as patriarchal-dominant Lord God (ruler, king, generals, world leaders, judges, Lord of hosts, etc.) became. The man created (is) God in his (own) image, namely the Lord, the ruler and patriarch, and the man's world (! Theology was already always the business of men) is (e) God so ago, how (s) is just a human being presented in his better works, namely, as a man, if the people imagine God male, then once all the men are now "god-like" than the women!
is patriarchy, when men (or they have created social norms) ü on the life and decide on the value of women. However, there is absolutely no philosophical, theological or psychological reason, which also removed only allow, to prove the superiority of the husband or the wife or devalue the feminine may be.
On the contrary, Lae, the panic of the men with power loss and power loss , sst say: Without power, and penis, reduced only to their bare humanity, is condemned by many men left little to some extent justified to draw conclusions could be in a mature and comprehensive, a "round" = balanced, balanced and (emotionally) healthy personality. Not that little bit more brain mass, but the bigger biceps created the macho and that awareness of male superiority!
If, as in male primates precursors of the human species is to be noted that they have never stopped, from generation to generation - and in humans: from culture to culture - to dominate the females and their combat superiority in the predominance of the seemingly weaker implement more imaginative and less combative sex, then here is the fact whole point of. The reasons for this dominance was in the (in) Biology and Physiology
And that is: From the beginning, built stronger than the males and the females therefore more able to harass them and to maltreat. In addition, enjoyed in the early hunting cultures of the man so very high regard because he was on the hunt (in general) and in the fight against big and wild animals (especially) the death of his forehead and gave it proved its superiority over nature: On the killing ability May and killing his power was based on the animals, about nature, about the world, about the people.
so there was not the business of war (in the narrower and wider sense of the aggressive and combative) and therefore the killing was to date the domain of men, and the war then and now and in the course of human history, the symmetric counterpart to motherhood, the opposite of the principle of creating and Hege, promotion and preservation of life! In any case, can be (aside moral evaluation) rightly assert:
The woman is the better man, in the sense that as women in a much more intense, more tangible form in a denser, deeper, broader and more inclusive meaning humanity than the top-heavy, on control, external power and performance, on rationalism and Verstandeseinseitigkeit polarized men with their arrogant and Penis-/Potenzfixiertheit gockel liable Überlegenheitsallüre.
A beginning of the end of patriarchy ld , sst celebrate only if the women themselves and their solidarity Recognize and value as a woman is no longer defined by her husband, on the one hand, and when the men are comfortable, to say goodbye to winning mentality and Überlegenheitsallüre and are willing to surrender power and a kind of "demagnetization ; nnlichung "in the sense of increasing emotional appeal, on the other. Still taught to the children, masculinity would be to not be female. Through this delegation of emotional forces in the man to the woman, the man dispossessed inside himself and is increasingly desolate.
It is a blatant shortening of being human, if in man the qualities of the "anima", namely vulnerability, dependence, commitment, empathy, compassion and mercy, etc. split off and are denounced as effeminate. A feminization of the man with the original primacy of emotion before the rational and be aware that we are all emotional beings, and this from an early age. Therefore, it is an expression of spiritual maturity and a basic piece of psychological normality, emotions have to allow them to cultivate it and to show, and they recognize the other.
The two sexes are not equal, not very similar. And yet, harmony and balance between the sexes is so far announced, as both are to form the feminine and masculine qualities in themselves (major-minor, Yin Yang, anima-persona). You bring the feminine and masculine balance, then you bring on a magical and mysterious way the world into balance.
any case, women may sit in any case the seemingly ineradicable misunderstanding, as it were even remotely a question of how the men. If even transformation, then no more woman-or man-being, but only such a holistic approach to, and thus to human integrity that does not allow ranking, let alone a devaluation of female and male
More about in. Bernhard A. Grimm "The woman - the better man. Plea against the age-old devaluation of the feminine, "Ephata Verlag, Pfaffenhofen 1999th
Other publications by Dr. phil. Bernhard A. Grimm: http://www.dr-bernhard-grimm.de/
# # #
Press: Online Editor, Winfried Brumma, Munich
http://www.wbrnet.info/presse.html
# # #
in human history as an unbroken history of power can be extended to all periods, the irrepressible desire of people to determine, on other to rule and they depress, they exterminate defame and degrade, to enslave them and kill them.
In this highly dualistic of forces between power and powerlessness , between domination and cruel Abha ; ngigkeitsverhältnissen there were always losers, people who had to pull the shorter - and among them were always, and especially women
"They cut me with a razor blade, a piece of meat between his legs. out - afterwards they sewed me literally with a sheep intestine. Conservative estimates by the World Health Organization, speaking of 80 million - other no less credible statistics of 130 million! -. Women and girls who have experience only in North and Central Africa, the terrible experience of female circumcision
In Egypt, betrayed courageous sociologists, 70% of urban women and 90% of rural women circumcised. More than 100,000 girls die each year from this painful ordeal. The fundamental devaluation of women and the female can hardly get a stronger expression than just in the mutilation the female genitals - it is the destruction of the woman as a woman in her sexuality and belonging to its essence, a brutal cut in their soul, from this injury is never whole again.
genital mutilation is an act of oppression, neglect and abuse, which women are exposed because they are women. ! Face of such disgusting patriarchal patterns of thinking must be propagated globally: Human rights are not rights of men
In 1793, in Poznan, the last witch burned - because of witch hunt in the supposedly "dark" Middle Ages! The Memory of genocide of Jews, Armenians and Kurds in the media always boiled new - but is forced to forget the inhuman spectacle of the witch craze, the indescribable injustice murder of millions of innocent women as witches allegedly allied with Satan himself.
The demonization of women has a long history, and already, the male authors of the report creation has struck for the beginning of human history in passing blame cheap attempt to Eva Adams the chord for the inferiority of women "The woman you put here with me, she gave me the Tree, where to eat and I ate "
This Adam and Eve myth -. The wife came in second in the world and has sinned be the first! - Is the basis for male and female shift blame original sin. The woman (Eve) as a seductress and as an accomplice of Satan, the equation of Eve with the evil, this has already let Tertullian (2nd century) say: "You are the goal of Satan ... you deserve to die, and instead had to die, the son of God. "
500 years, were burned" witches ", innocent Girls and women, especially midwives and wise women, referring to the primal power of Eros, the woman, ultimately, the primal power of their own sex drive, which the man (and celibate clergy) did not admit was allowed to. For torture and burning men were always the informer, prosecutor and judge, the sadistic torturer and executioner. Estimates amount to up to nine million victims of the madness of the witch trials!
Throughout human history have been (and until the present day) is not only a vicious dualism between man and nature, but also between women and men, as it piled up as totally irreconcilable polarity: evil - well, underprivileged - higher quality, and this in total disregard of the incontrovertible truth that the archetype of the woman and of God or the Divine Feminine is much more related than the principle of masculinity.
because the origin of life itself, his death and his rebirth in the course of nature tells of a mystery, the the woman - in myth and history - much closer than is the man! Not only for the Greek Philosopher Aristotle was the wife of an unfinished, of failed and broken "man", that at a deeper level of head of development derailed and stopped in their development process and misdirected, and for the great theologian Thomas Aquinas was the wife misguided and mutilated male, something that is not intended in itself but is due to a defect. Bernard of Clairvaux called the woman a primitive, low-quality sexual being, an imperfect animal (!).
The Christian "misogyny" has ultimately biblical Background. Already in the creation story, Genesis 3 verse 16, a chord is struck, in the West clearly echoed in the oppression of women or in the supremacy of the man: "And the woman said the Lord: all I want your hardship, Thou shalt bring forth children in appeal. After your husband is thy desire, and he shall be your master, "
The God of the Old Testament speaks of love as a curse: the patriarchy is the first sentence - the love is in a Machtgefä! ; ll change. To the fact that the Genesis the woman to the subordinates of the man has done is das Fatale dies: Es hat sich nicht nur die gesamte abendländische Kultur daran orientiert, sondern diese Aussage hat den Machtanspruch des Mannes, die Zweitrangigkeit und die Nachordnung der Frau hinter dem Manne quasi aus göttlicher Ordnung und Allmacht legitimiert und als natürliche Schöpfungsordnung festgeschrieben.
Man hat die Bibel immer selektiv gelesen und interpretiert, wobei die Theologen so gut wie ausschließlich Männer waren. So hat denn Genesis 1,27 keine Wirkungsgeschichte gehabt: „Und Gott schuf den Menschen nach seinem Bilde, nach dem Bilde Gottes schuf er ihn, als Mann und Frau schuf er sie.“ This is clearly expressed that the woman participates equally in the image of God as the man - in unmistakable clarity formulated the text of the equivalence, the equal dignity and equal status of women
! But this passage more or less fizzled out in the heritage of the Judeo-Christian father religion, where God as patriarchal-dominant Lord God (ruler, king, generals, world leaders, judges, Lord of hosts, etc.) became. The man created (is) God in his (own) image, namely the Lord, the ruler and patriarch, and the man's world (! Theology was already always the business of men) is (e) God so ago, how (s) is just a human being presented in his better works, namely, as a man, if the people imagine God male, then once all the men are now "god-like" than the women!
is patriarchy, when men (or they have created social norms) ü on the life and decide on the value of women. However, there is absolutely no philosophical, theological or psychological reason, which also removed only allow, to prove the superiority of the husband or the wife or devalue the feminine may be.
On the contrary, Lae, the panic of the men with power loss and power loss , sst say: Without power, and penis, reduced only to their bare humanity, is condemned by many men left little to some extent justified to draw conclusions could be in a mature and comprehensive, a "round" = balanced, balanced and (emotionally) healthy personality. Not that little bit more brain mass, but the bigger biceps created the macho and that awareness of male superiority!
If, as in male primates precursors of the human species is to be noted that they have never stopped, from generation to generation - and in humans: from culture to culture - to dominate the females and their combat superiority in the predominance of the seemingly weaker implement more imaginative and less combative sex, then here is the fact whole point of. The reasons for this dominance was in the (in) Biology and Physiology
And that is: From the beginning, built stronger than the males and the females therefore more able to harass them and to maltreat. In addition, enjoyed in the early hunting cultures of the man so very high regard because he was on the hunt (in general) and in the fight against big and wild animals (especially) the death of his forehead and gave it proved its superiority over nature: On the killing ability May and killing his power was based on the animals, about nature, about the world, about the people.
so there was not the business of war (in the narrower and wider sense of the aggressive and combative) and therefore the killing was to date the domain of men, and the war then and now and in the course of human history, the symmetric counterpart to motherhood, the opposite of the principle of creating and Hege, promotion and preservation of life! In any case, can be (aside moral evaluation) rightly assert:
The woman is the better man, in the sense that as women in a much more intense, more tangible form in a denser, deeper, broader and more inclusive meaning humanity than the top-heavy, on control, external power and performance, on rationalism and Verstandeseinseitigkeit polarized men with their arrogant and Penis-/Potenzfixiertheit gockel liable Überlegenheitsallüre.
A beginning of the end of patriarchy ld , sst celebrate only if the women themselves and their solidarity Recognize and value as a woman is no longer defined by her husband, on the one hand, and when the men are comfortable, to say goodbye to winning mentality and Überlegenheitsallüre and are willing to surrender power and a kind of "demagnetization ; nnlichung "in the sense of increasing emotional appeal, on the other. Still taught to the children, masculinity would be to not be female. Through this delegation of emotional forces in the man to the woman, the man dispossessed inside himself and is increasingly desolate.
It is a blatant shortening of being human, if in man the qualities of the "anima", namely vulnerability, dependence, commitment, empathy, compassion and mercy, etc. split off and are denounced as effeminate. A feminization of the man with the original primacy of emotion before the rational and be aware that we are all emotional beings, and this from an early age. Therefore, it is an expression of spiritual maturity and a basic piece of psychological normality, emotions have to allow them to cultivate it and to show, and they recognize the other.
The two sexes are not equal, not very similar. And yet, harmony and balance between the sexes is so far announced, as both are to form the feminine and masculine qualities in themselves (major-minor, Yin Yang, anima-persona). You bring the feminine and masculine balance, then you bring on a magical and mysterious way the world into balance.
any case, women may sit in any case the seemingly ineradicable misunderstanding, as it were even remotely a question of how the men. If even transformation, then no more woman-or man-being, but only such a holistic approach to, and thus to human integrity that does not allow ranking, let alone a devaluation of female and male
More about in. Bernhard A. Grimm "The woman - the better man. Plea against the age-old devaluation of the feminine, "Ephata Verlag, Pfaffenhofen 1999th
Other publications by Dr. phil. Bernhard A. Grimm: http://www.dr-bernhard-grimm.de/
# # #
Press: Online Editor, Winfried Brumma, Munich
http://www.wbrnet.info/presse.html
# # #
0 comments:
Post a Comment