The question of Cain after the murder of his brother Abel is the question of responsibility. Neither they nor the question of why the responsibility is the Bible on this information.
may here be made of the philosophical-anthropological attempt to not only prove that man has to bear responsibility unavoidable that as a doctor in my focus on medical ethics for the homo patiens elementary'm responsible, but also to ascertain why this is and I do not escape this responsibility can.
A handful of programmatic statements like anticipatory sketch the reasoning of the presentation:
1) The Dialogic is emerging as a fundamental category of human
life is always something Dialogical.
Man is a much more dialogical beings.
He is also answering the essence.
2) human means In question-and-life means standing replies
Human existence is a dialogue-led exchange of man with his environment and is a member, with his situation world.
However, it is: The situation is always situation for me and demands a response from me, either way.
3) Respondeo ergo sum = I answer, so I'm
know the answers, experience, I myself as a place to feel alive, as existing.
answers is here as an expression of Reagieren, für Erwidern, für In-Resonanz-Stehen, natürlich auch für sprachliche, in Zeichen oder Worte formulierte Antworten.
Solange der Mensch lebt, antwortet er - wenn er tot ist, antwortet er nicht mehr.
4.) Verantwortung ist fundamentaler Ausdruck der dialogischen Existenz des Menschen
und damit wesenhaft mit dem Menschsein verbunden
Das Schlüsselsymbol „respondeo ergo sum“ wird zur Grundlage für die Ethik: all (reply) acting under constraints of justification:
How and what I say (or not handle handle), I have to answer for it.
Without responsiveness, there is no responsibility.
5) I am responsible for the thing that stands in my action right.
towards the responsible post facto (causal profit responsibility for action), there is also a responsibility factum ante: the determination to do right (care-responsibility):
a situation, a situation (illness, injury, etc.) expected of me do you want (which corresponds to an IS INTENDED). Therefore: Responsibility: obedience to a supposed to have been!
6) I would therefore strongly supports the existence of a normatively relevant relation between subject and object of responsibility
The parent-child relationship is the classic paradigm, the timeless archetype of responsibility (Look at the baby - if only his existence or screaming and is entitled to request the contemporary world, to take care of him!).
The doctor-patient relationship as a unique dyad is the archetype Party and is a relationship that one - brings the dimension of care - about the only functional competence more extensive.
publications of Dr. phil. Bernhard A. Grimm: http://www.dr-bernhard-grimm.de
# # #
Press: Online Editor, Winfried Brumma, Munich
http:// www.wbrnet.info / presse.html
# # #
# # #
Press: Online Editor, Winfried Brumma, Munich
http:// www.wbrnet.info / presse.html
# # #
0 comments:
Post a Comment